Posted 04 June 2008 - 11:58 AM
I like your analogy Nett, and the points you make also. That is fantastic country along the road, and vastly different to the rest of the state also. Even the buttongrass plains create an awesome vista up there.
The Greens want to see the road closed and turned into what they call "a high class walking and bicycle track", which they compare to the Overland Track. This will restrict the area to the young, healthy and wealthy. Currently a 5 day guided trek through the Tarkine costs around $1600 per person. I imagine fees for guided Explorer treks would be around the same, if not more. With the road public and open it is accessible to all people regardless of ability and wealth, (even with Tasmania paying high prices for fuel, the trip remains affordable).
The Greens claim the road is not widely used and that having traffic through that area is asking for disaster, pointing to the recent fires as a prime example. The road is becoming much more popular and is used more than many other roads elsewhere in the state. If their argument is to be accepted, then we had best be closing the road through the World Heritage Area as it has a thousand times more traffic, making it at least a thousand times more likely there will be an accident causing destruction of the area. To use an argument that states traffic through the Explorer route creates hazards that could lead to the destruction of the area, and then attempt to use that claim to close the road is ridiculous.
There is definitely a go slow on the work required to reopen this road, and one can only wonder at what underlying politics are influencing the situation. It will be a shame if the road remains closed.
The secret to getting what you want, is to want what you
need
If this website helps you, please consider a donation
to help us keep the site running. Site Supporters (over $20 donation) also get ad free browsing
